PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AGAINST ISLAM
A Proposed Constitutional Amendment
(Note the need for this Amendment at the end)
Background and justification to Amendment 28
(self-defense/survival measure)
Whereas; Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing the same;
Whereas; the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a ‘religious test’ for participation in the body politic;
Whereas; Islam includes a complete political and social structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supercedes any civil law and that Islam mandates that no secular or democratic institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;
Whereas; Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and supplant all other religions and democratic institutions;
Whereas; Saudi Arabia , the spiritual home of Islam does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil and even ‘moderate’ Muslims states such as Turkey and Malaysia actively suppress other religions;
Whereas; Islam includes as its basic tenant the spread of the faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions;
Whereas; on 9/11/2001 19 Muslim hijackers acting in the name of Islam killed 3,000 Americans, and numerous other acts of terrorism have been directed at the American people around the world;
Whereas; representatives of Islam around the world including Osama Bin Laden (architect of 9/11), the government of Iran including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, HAMAS, Hezbollah, and other Islamic groups have declared jihad (war) on America, and regularly declare that America should cease to exist;
Whereas; there is no organized Islamic opposition to violent proponents of Islam;
Therefore: Islam is not a religion, but a political ideology more akin to Fascism and totally in opposition to the ideals of freedom as described in the United States Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.
Be it resolved that the following Amendment to the Constitution be adopted:
Article I
The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion. The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.
Article II
As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited.
Article III
Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress.
No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.
The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam’s history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.
The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and death as proscribed by Congress.
Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death. Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States .
Article IV
Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.
THE REASON THE AMENDMENT IS NEEDED
I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz.
We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims.
In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.
The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned.
And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.
They have turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.
Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.
And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.
We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.
What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.
Comments
I am with you Hans; however I fear the American is not convinced Mohammedanism is more a political ideology than a religion. I am going to seek out and sign this petition; however I am fairly certain (at this point) that the lack Jihad education in America will find this Amendment repugnant.
A grassroots movement in America needs to be started (something like Gabriel's - Act! For America - has began) to spread the word about the ideology of Mohammedanism as opposed to the religious practice of Mohammedanism.
I think a better possibility to enact an Amendment to the Constitution declaring America a nation with a Judeo-Christian heritage without establishing any particular Jewish sect (Orthodox, Conservative or ) or Christian Denomination (Variations of Protestantism, Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox etc.) as a State religion.
This would simultaneously deal with Secular Humanism war on Christianity and radical Islam.
O yes, I hope you don't mind. I am going to cross your post on a couple of my blogs.
Ben I went there to sign the petition and there is a big muslim ad right in the center of the signatures. What a crock.
Spread it around :)
Its an uphill fight to be sure. But when has it been any other way when the antion had to fight for its survival. The idea of separating muslims from western culture (by law or force if necessary) as utterly irreconcilable with and fatally hostile to our way of life, is a strong idea thats not going away. Its poping up all over the place on the net.
Check out some of Lawrence Auster's writings as well as VDare and Inverted World.
Thanks for the links!
Good luck with it.
No silly me won't be signing it.
Oh I would have left this comment at Humbled Infidel's post too, but unfortunately my right to free speech has been blocked over there.
Amendment 28
http://www.anewtone.com/2008/04/amendment-28_25.html
I'm with you on the deportation of all Muslims. But, as you said, it's a good document for moving the conversation along.
If possible, I'd love to cross-post the Article 28 article on Westernfront America - with all the proper links to the original of course.
Ok its not a tsunami yet, but I have a feeling that the Cult - oops - Religion of Peace is likely to help things along over the next few years. 'Not in my lifetime' may be a bit premature unless Muslims suddenly en mass catch a severe case of sanity - we can hope (Barak hasnt copyrighted that word has he ?).
As to Humble Infidel - your freedom of speech ends where his right to free association begins :). It's HI's space - you have all of everywhere else - including here - to freely practice speech.
Later :) Hans
I am afraid I do not see this type of action as a solution to unifying or making a country such as America safer. Actions such as these would just make Muslims in other countries even more hostile to America and rightfully so.
Also this type of action would obviously make the peace loving American Muslims feel totally alienated and righteously angry, which would lead to more violence in your country.
My experience with Muslims has been positive. I have written a post in response to this petition, “Reuniting the Children of Abraham” and in the past I have written a number of posts portraying Muslims in a justifiably favourable light: “The unheard voices of Islam” and “Yeh Hum Naheen – This is not us”
I am well aware that there are Muslims who are behaving violently, but I do not agree with the overall negative portrayal of Muslims that this petition is indicating.
I did not invent "fight them until" or "Make war upon"; Moe did. Who urged the Muslims to fight? Who cursed any who would turn from Jihad to agriculture as a way of life?
Muslims might be offended? Goddamn big deal!!! I am offended, pissed off, outraged and moved to extreme execration by the constant stream of threats and attacks flowing from Islam over the last 1384 years and particularly by the wanton murder of 3000 of my countrymen a few years ago, not to mention the destruction of my own economic prospects. Islam can go to Hell, and I am here to serve as Usher.
Where do you propose they be deported to, given many were born here?
What exactly have American Muslims done to deserve this type of treatment?
Luckily your voices are lost in the wilderness.
Your actions are increasing hatred and not reducing it. Your actions are becoming part of the growing problem of hatred throughout the world. Do not call your religion one of love if this is how you behave. Thankfully your behavior is not the majority view of Christianity.
Shame on all of you.
The problem is, these are the words that are followed by Islam. And more have been added. Moe was a murderer, pedophile, etc. Those that follow this teaching for whatever reason, are agreeing with it.
Any Islamic satrapy of their choice.
What exactly have American Muslims done to deserve this type of treatment?
Adherence to the damnable doctrines of Islam enshrined in Al-Anfal, Al-Taubah, Al-Ahzab & As-Saff. and exemplified in Moe's sunnah, particularly Bukhari's Jihad, Khumus & Expedition.
Luckily your voices are lost in the wilderness.
Your luck is running out. A growing number of Americans are becoming informed and activated. There is a Terrorism/Jihad Caucus in our Congress with more than 100 members. Videos, blogs and books detailing Islamic doctrine & history are multiplying rapidly and receiving large audiences.
Your actions are increasing hatred and not reducing it.
That claim fits Islamic actions. We have not taken actions, we have only used words. PanAm 103, WTC1, OKC, WTC2, London, Madrid & Beslan generate hatred of what Islam is and does.
Your actions are becoming part of the growing problem of hatred throughout the world.
The hatred is Allah's: his hatred of Kuffar expressed in 8:39, 8:67, 9:29- 35 & 47:4.
Do not call your religion one of love if this is how you behave.
Jesus taught love and persuasion, not warfare. He neither commanded nor exemplified conquest, genocide nor terrorism. Moe did! We are willing to live in peace with all mankind; Islam demands submission obtained by intimidation & violent attack. My writings, including my on line petitions reflect fact & logic, not religion.
Thankfully your behavior is not the majority view of Christianity. Shame on all of you.
The majority view of Islam is clear on the face of 1384 years of history, a trail of blood, bones & tears stretching from one end of the earth to the other. What Islam is & does is clearly evident on the face of its texts and the face of the globe. How shameful it is to declare a murdering pedophile rapist & lecher the greatest and bes of men; to revere him as a role model and emulate his barbarian conduct.
Look, one more time, its really quite simple - sorry if you just can't get it -
A) It is NOT about hating - thats your personal projection - has nothing to do with anything - its has nothing to do with emotions - (except revultion maybe).
B) Islam seeks to conquer the world - one way or another.
C) It IS about SURVIVAL.
D) I/We will not submit. In in so doing will also save your ass along the way.
---Your welcome :)
Want to know what commandments I write of? Then seek out my blog post titled ROPMA, wherein I list the titles of several of Ibn Kathir's Tafsir topics, each linked to the contents at www.tafsir.com.
The Command for Jihad against the Disbelievers and the HypocritesThe Command to fight Those Who fight Muslims and killing Them wherever They are foundThe Command to strike the Enemies’ Necks, tighten Their Bonds, and then free Them either by an Act of Grace or for a RansomThe Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the JizyahThe Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest AreasThe Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and KufrThe Order to fight until there is no more FitnahThe Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers and HypocritesThose Tafsir combine the ayat with related ayat & relevant ahadith in a way that makes Allah's commandments crystal clear. Who knew their meaning better than he who recited them? What did he do in obedience to them? He said "I am commanded to fight", and he fought Kuffar, with barbaric terrorism & genocide. That is Islam. That is hatred, greed, pride & lust in action. Death & damnation be upon it and upon its founder and the demon he worshiped!!!
I have a fair idea of where Ben stands in regards to Islam, although I do not agree with everything he has said, I do at least admire his honesty.
I am wondering just exactly how far you all agree with him?
I asked a question over at JudgeBob's blog (Bob if you read this I will get back to you in regards to your comments).
My question was:
"Tell me why are we over in Iraq helping a nation of terrible evil people? Why don't we just blow them back to the stone age if that is how bad they are? So in Iraq with a population of about 25 million people only 750, 000 are good people. Not quite how the article at Humbled indicated the situation is."
Ben's answer was:
We invaded Iraq because the damn fool traitor we elected President 8 years ago
has been bought off by the Saudis just as his father was and Clinton between them. Shrub engages in a maundering fabulism, asserting that Islam is compatible with liberty & democracy when it is plainly inimical to both. An Islamic regime will be an evil warmonger no matter what its internal structure, whether feudal, inherited monarchy or elected.
The installation of quasi democratic constitutions and parliamentary systems in Afghanistan & Iraq is a fool's errand of the worst sort, a total waste of lives & treasure. We sent invasion forces where Nukes were required. The stated strategic objective is impossible to obtain..............................
Because Islam is pure, unmitigated evil, there is no such thing as a "good Muslim".
So it seems Ben is saying we shouldn't have gone over there in the first place and yes we should have blown them all back to the stone age - Ben please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
I am actually wondering if anyone else is prepared to weigh in with their opinions?
I am wondering because in the past a few of you have said the following:
Now before anyone jumps down my throat and says I don't care about the Iraqi people, I do as that should be obvious given I have come to the defense of some Muslims. I also respect and admire our troops. So don't get tangled in side issues please.
I am getting mixed messages, so I was hoping for a bit of clarification please.
Ben says there are NO good Muslims and they should have been nuked.
Some of you are also saying there are no good Muslims on this post, but elsewhere you are saying we are over in the Middle East to help them because they are worth protecting. Or since you said those things is there now a new condition in helping the people in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that is they must renounce their religion of Islam?
Is anyone prepared to share?
Next part of your comment. Let me see how do I respond to "boo hoo hoo". Oh please don't cry you will get over it, I know I have.
Enjoy your night.
Michael
Given Muslims have been continually told to denounce the extremists in their midst, I guess Christians should do likewise.
As an American Christian I do not agree with the actions being promoted here, especially towards our fellow Americans.
Goodnight to you all.
Michael.
Glad you dropped by.
Take care :)
H
Not everyone in Iraq and Afghanistan are Muslim. And many are only muslim because they've been forced to be. If they deny Islam, well we all know what that means....Off with their head...or stoning to death, or hung... but never quickly, torture is another one of Islams actions they love.
You didn't want to get into side subjects, then why did you use comments off of bluesingincats abortion post?
Trying to drive a wedge between, say, me and Ben is a tactic that we will not fall prey too. That's a common liberal tactic.